What to make of Boulder Brands’ near-billion dollar acquisition

We write often of Colorado’s powerful craft food and beverage sector, but last week’s news of Pinnacle Foods acquisition of Boulder Brands for nearly a billion dollars was an eye-opener.

The $975 million price tag, including $265 million in debt, is 29X net earnings (EBITDA), a staggering multiple, especially for a company that’s struggled lately to maintain sales ‘velocity’ for some of its brands. In early summer, when Boulder Brands announced that Stephen Hughes, the company’s CEO, would be leaving, analysts assumed the worst, at least in the short term. TheStreet’s David Peltier said this:

“You certainly don’t want to step in and try to buy Boulder, where the previous CEO left on a sour note. It will likely take a few months to find a permanent replacement, the core Smart Balance brand is not performing well and the steam has come out of the expected growth of its gluten-free brands. . . . The company is no longer a growth story and even though the stock has fallen 36% so far this year, at north of 20X expected full-year earnings, it isn’t cheap enough yet to attract value investors.”

Right. So why the huge deal?

Certainly Pinnacle covets a newer more progressive portfolio, featuring more gluten-free, natural, and organic brands. Boulder’s the national epicenter for innovation and brand development in the sector, so on one level it’s no surprise for those paying attention.

“The conventional players understand they have to evolve or get left behind,” says Ross Shell, CEO of Boulder-based Red Idea Partners, a venture firm focused on early-stage natural food companies. “The valuations on these transactions may seem high, but these deals are based far more around future growth expectations. The hope is that the growth potential plays out handsomely over time to justify the valuation,” he explains.

But a billion dollars worth of healthy burritos and gluten-free spreads? Wow. Are we seeing Colorado’s influential sector reach a tipping point, where the quiet innovation that’s been ongoing here suddenly translates into a string of mergers and acquisitions with heady valuations like the Boulder Brands deal?

Bill Capsalis, president of influential trade group Naturally Boulder, doesn’t go that far but agrees with the premise. “We can expect to see more of this type of activity in the near future,” he says. “This investment validates what we’ve known for a long time – that there’s a food revolution going on.”

It’s also a very active M&A market; deal-makers describe it as ‘frothy’. And while 30X deals are the exception, today it’s a seller’s market for companies with a healthy balance sheet, regardless of sector.

Frothy or not it’s a good guess that Colorado’s transcendent food sector is set to reap the benefits of at least a decade of incredible creativity and entrepreneurship. And craft beer may be next.

Of course, the big difference is that no major brand from Colorado’s first movers has yet to be fully acquired. Oskar Blues created a stir several months back by divesting a controlling interest, but details remain very closely guarded. The community is so tight that the fear of blowback from ‘selling out’ remains a barrier. For many, the tie that binds craft brewers to loyal customers is local ownership.

But consider the multiples that may be in play. Last year a Wall Street Journal article theorized that craft-beer makers are worth roughly $1,000 per barrel of annual production, a number as gaudy as 30X EBITDA. And that was a year ago. The craft beer movement has accelerated at least as fast as the natural and organic trend — and the big craft beer brands arguably carry more weight than those in food.

Is New Belgium a billion-dollar brand? At $1,000 per barrel, it will reach that threshold this year. At that rate, Colorado’s beer landscape is also littered with $50 million and $100 million craft brands, from Oskar Blues to Odell to Left Hand to Breckenridge to Great Divide.

But as much as AB or Molson Coors would like to emulate Pinnacle Foods, we’ll likely be waiting a good spell to find out.

Bart Taylor is publisher of CompanyWeek. Reach him at btaylor@companyweek.com.

CU’s economic forecast positive, but manufacturing advocates may be disappointed


The news was generally positive this past Monday at the University of Colorado’s 51st annual Business Economic Outlook program, hosted by the Leeds School of Business. Richard Wobbekind, senior associate dean for academic programs, again emceed what has become the most important and substantive forecasting event for Colorado’s economy.

As the report surmised:

“The state is measurably outperforming due to the talented workforce, key infrastructure for entrepreneurship, diverse industries, and the aggressive efforts by state and local economic development.”

Last year, the state ranked fifth nationally in real GDP growth; the pace of employment growth ranked third; personal income growth, seventh. Further:

“Real GDP increased 4.7 percent year-over-year compared to 2.4 percent nationally. Per capita income rose 4.5 percent compared to 3.6 percent nationally.”

All signs point to another strong year ahead. Voices on a national level questioning the strength of the U.S. economy haven’t paid attention to what’s happening in Colorado.

Among concerns, Wobbekind mentioned two with emphasis: a growing lack of skilled labor that could stall business development; and housing prices. Generally, Wobbekind and co-presenter Kelly Brough of the Denver Metro Chamber set a balanced tone in celebrating success while forecasting that in 2016 growth will slow slightly as Colorado reaches full employment, interest rates rise, and systemic challenges in workforce and affordable housing take a larger toll.

The news from Leeds was mixed for manufacturing. Recent ISM data that point to a contracting national manufacturing sector dampened Wobbekind’s comments, though employment in Colorado’s sector is forecast to continue to expand if at a slightly lower rate. Year-over-year employment grew around 3 percent from ’14-15 to just over 140,000 total jobs, and 2016 is forecast to add another 2,500 jobs.

“…a stark takeaway from the Leeds report is that very little about the sector is viewed as resurgent or transformative.”

The data indicate positive changes in Colorado’s manufacturing sector that should translate into faster growth. There’s a discernible shift from durable goods in volatile sectors like computers and electronics to nondurable like food and beverage, reflecting the strength of home-grown industry more inured to international uncertainty including the strength of the dollar, or energy cycles.

At the same time, manufacturing advocates may be disappointed that one, the report doesn’t make a meaningful connection between the goods-producing sector and growth in trade, transportation, and utilities, the state’s leading workforce sector with over 450,000 employees; and, lacks references to Colorado’s high-growth maker industries as drivers of future economic growth.

For example the report makes little mention of Colorado’s natural and organic food sector and forecasts food manufacturing to add 500 jobs in 2016, to just over 21,000 total. It’s a conservative estimate. Colorado’s high-energy sector is churning out start-ups, attracting talent and capital and has become a magnet for established companies who want to be here to be part of the ‘revolution’ in the food business.

Moreover, a thriving ecosystem of professional services and trade jobs are being created to support manufacturing – upstream and down – from the development of raw materials to management and sales, marketing and finance, real estate, logistics, wholesale and retail trade. A significant bump in Professional, Scientific and Technical Services jobs forecast by the Outlook is certainly tied to growth in manufacturing; how much is unclear. But manufacturing’s multiplier effect is powerful, both in attracting supply-chain companies to support industry and creating second- and- third jobs.

Add the supply chain to the conversation and everything changes. Until that happens, a stark takeaway from the Leeds report is that very little about the sector is viewed as resurgent or transformative. Colorado manufacturers are on a winning streak (read today about Vestas Towers); growth is steady and evolving in ways that might profoundly change the economy. Advocates like CompanyWeek can do more to communicate the value of manufacturing, including how one manufacturing job drives employment gains in the state’s service and trade sectors.

Time to redouble our efforts. And believe that 2016 is the year we’ll make a bigger difference.

Bart Taylor is publisher of CompanyWeek. Reach him at btaylor@companyweek.com.

ULA launch an eye-opener

Colorado companies make a lot of cool stuff, but it’s hard to beat what United Launch Alliance is building from its Greenwood Village- based headquarters. This past Saturday ULA’s GPS IIF-11 mission lifted off from Cape Canaveral, Florida, hitting a 30 minute or so launch window after being delayed a day due to technical issues. ULA’s Atlas 5 rocket assembly was flawless, lifting the 11th GPS satellite into orbit of what will be a 12-satellite ‘constellation’ for both civilian and military use.

For the ULA technicians on-hand in Colorado, the launch seemed routine. For those in the viewing gallery, like me, it seemed anything but. Experiencing a launch from ‘mission control’ was a throwback a couple decades to Apollo and later to the space shuttle. It’s rocket science, and it’s a flat-out rush.

Actually it’s high-tech manufacturing at its best, informed by science and technology and supported by advanced supply-chain management. That we don’t call it manufacturing or classify it as such in Colorado says a lot about how far the sector has fallen in the hierarchy of most-favored trades. We call it aerospace, which of course it is, but ULA is one of Colorado’s most important and high-profile OEMs.

A joint-venture between Lockheed and Boeing, ULA boasts the marketing tagline ‘America’s Ride to Space.’ It’s every bit of that. A ULA rocket assembly will lift the next human into space in a Boeing capsule called ‘Starliner.’ That is, they’ll be next if ULA can beat its upstart competitor into orbit, Elon Musk’s SpaceX. ULA hopes to launch in October 2017. Two years from now. It’s an aggressive timeline.

The first Starliner will also follow ULA’s high-profile Mars mission, slated for next March, this on the heels of New Horizons and the stunning success in flying by Pluto that began on a ULA rocket assembly. It was also announced Monday that ULA has won a NASA contract for a commercial satellite launch, in addition to new programs that will improve the company’s competitive standing in an increasingly crowded field.

Can ULA become the new GM or Ford of Colorado? All three companies design and manufacture sophisticated vehicles. Each employ thousands of people and buy from local contract manufacturers and suppliers.

It’s not likely until more components are actually made here, though it shouldn’t matter. ULA’s rockets are assembled along a supply chain that begins in Colorado but extends throughout the southeast U.S. and today, into Russia for engines. ULA’s headquarters are here, along with design and engineering. Much of the fabrication and assembly is done in Decatur, Alabama. Final assembling and roll-out of the spacecraft happens in Florida — or California, as ULA missions also launch from Vandenberg Air Force Base.

The design and engineering jobs wouldn’t exist independent of manufacturing any more than GM’s car designers would, but we’ve created an arbitrary distinction. Warehouse or trucking jobs that depend on manufacturing don’t count either: Today we don’t correlate them with ‘manufacturing.’ If we did, economic data would reflect a more influential sector. As the Wall Street Journal‘s Justin Lahart points out this week, “goods production, most of which is manufacturing, represents 30 percent of gross domestic product.”

It’s a pesky side note to what’s otherwise a celebration of one Colorado’s most accomplished companies. And with more high-profile space missions to come, the light will only shine brighter on ULA and the region’s burgeoning manufacturing economy.

Bart Taylor is publisher of CompanyWeek. Reach him at btaylor@companyweek.com.

[Nominate a manufacturing ‘game changer’ like ULA as part of the Colorado Manufacturing Awards. Here’s more information.]

Artisans abound: Colorado’s craft manufacturers compete globally, navigate homegrown challenges

Pete Wagner and his merry band of ski makers call southwest Colorado home, Placerville, to be precise, on State Highway 145, the road into Telluride. Wagner Custom Skis will make around 1,500 pair of tailored boards this year, steady if ‘managed’ growth for one of the dozens of innovative outdoor gear and apparel manufacturers who call this region home.

Wagner boards look and ski the part of a high quality, low-volume craft brand, but making a lot more isn’t in the cards — for now. “We’re growing — we need more space,” Wagner says, “but real estate here is an issue; there aren’t a lot of options. It creates limitations in how we manage inventory.” Wagner’s not alone. From Telluride to Steamboat Springs to Denver, small but successful companies — maker businesses all — have reached a plateau where new challenges await.

It’s a familiar litany for small manufacturers: affordable real estate to accommodate growth; qualified, dependable labor; a parade of regulations and fees that intensify as business grows; and the need for greater brand awareness to compete at a higher level.

But these artisans of the modern manufacturing economy are resolute. They’ve already captured the ingredients that have come to define success in this economic wave — passion, authenticity, technology and process innovation — and take nothing for granted. Wagner’s invested in machinery, to be more efficient even if significantly higher volume eludes the company in the near-term. “We’ve increased production capacity by 50 percent,” Wagner says proudly, “with the same amount of labor.” Many have reached a level of profitability and predictability they only dreamed about, happy now to maintain a successful, meaningful lifestyle business.

Many others, like Wagner, aspire to the next level. It’s a group of companies and brands that years from now, will come to define business in the Rocky Mountain region. (We’ll showcase a few dozen prospects in next week’s holiday guide of regional consumer-manufacturing companies).

New barriers for growth companies stand in the way. With public investment in economic-development programs at record levels, you’d think a targeted resource kit would be readily available to help catapult these companies from early-stage success to breakout growth and profitability. Not so much.

“Brand awareness is our biggest challenge”, Pete Wagner says. I ask if the now-dormant Buy Colorado program, rolled out to much fanfare two years ago, or the more pervasive Made in America messaging, have been effective. “We haven’t seen direct evidence that it’s made a difference,” he offers, “but we’re selling an ultra-premium brand to skiers all over the world. The Colorado aspect’s important — it’s who we are — but it’s not that significant.”

It’s too early to jump off the Made in Colorado bandwagon but it’s also evident that initiatives designed to accelerate the growth of successful early stage maker businesses have to get better. The recent push in workforce development, as well-funded as it’s been, should produce short-term results. Industry-cluster strategies in aerospace and food and beverage are providing runways that accommodat well-managed, fast-moving brands. The development ecosystem is doing good things. More targeted help is needed.

At some point uber-competitive companies solve their problems — here or elsewhere. They’ll find reasonably-priced real-estate, available technology, labor, and infrastructure investments and development strategies conceived with manufacturers in mind.

It can and should be here. That’s Wagner’s intent. “We want to stay in this community – we’re an authentic ski brand,” he says emphatically. “Our people are passionate about being here.”

We should be equally passionate about making sure they stay.

Bart Taylor is founder and publisher of CompanyWeek.

Josh and Zora Tabin

Boulder struts its (food) stuff

For the 25 companies ‘pitching’ to the judging panel at the 11th annual Naturally Boulder Pitch Slam & Party, the questions came fast and followed a pattern:

“What’s the SRP (suggested retail price) and the shelf-life of your product?”

“Where do you manufacture? What’s the long term plan?”

“Where do you experience your highest (retail) ‘velocity’?”

“How do you differentiate your product in the crowded (fill in the blank) category?”

At stake for the winner was coveted booth space at Natural Products Expo West next March, spending cash, free business consulting and the attention and adulation of an industry sector that today has become a national superstar in the multi-billion dollar natural products industry.

The winner was Wild Zoraprofiled in CompanyWeek last year — a husband and wife team whose tasty natural meat and vegetable snack bars (think ingredient-enhanced jerky) stood out from a group of four or five products that were clearly the cream of the crop. Josh and Zora Tabin’s story is as compelling as their snacks, which seem poised for a national breakout if the company can scale manufacturing, no small issue when meat is involved. Zora’s kitchen gets a daily visit from food safety inspectors.

Food startups dominated the proceedings, and product themes followed familiar trends in the natural and organic sector — gluten-free was a staple — with some some quirky, inventive angles. There were RollinGreens‘ ‘tater tots made with millet instead of potatoes; Cow’s Gone, a non-dairy ice cream with coconut milk and natural sweeteners; Rowdy Mermaid kombucha, inspired by the owner’s charming daughter; cold-filtered coffee and a slew of interesting brownies, cookies and a ‘savory’ snack bars. Savory flavoring in the energy bar category also seems a new trend. ‘Paleo’ is still in. Grain-based, sweet-tasting snacks were nowhere to be found.

But as narratives go, the food companies this year took a back seat to the larger spectacle of the event itself and the unspoken feeling among the packed house at the St Julien Hotel & Spa that this community may be changing the rules of an entire industry sector. I congratulated a beaming Clif Harald of the Boulder Economic Council on the event. The companies, he said, “are perfect examples of the fresh ideas and entrepreneurship fueling this important sector of Colorado’s economy.”

Harald is right, of course, but the implications of the annual gathering seem wider. The event brings to light the sea change in how new products are being brought to market, in how the industry innovates. The days of industrial food companies devising the next mega-snack in a laboratory, with a top-down go-to-market strategy, feels far away from these companies. These are passion-fueled entrepreneurs, prototyping in apartment kitchens and earning their chops at farmers markets. Buyers from Whole Foods and Lucky’s provide the big break, offering shelf space for the most promising to test retail ‘velocity’ — that is, how fast and furious the product sells. It’s a ground-up, organic methodology, and its become the new norm in developing the next great thing — a Larabar, ProBar, or 34 Degrees cracker.

Equally transformative is the manufacturing ecosystem, the network of co-packers and maker resources that help the high-velocity brands manufacture in sufficient volume to meet the demand that regional and national distribution requires. Co-packers manufacture for multiple brands. They’re Colorado’s most unheralded business catalysts, providing critical lift to food companies that inevitably must wrestle with the challenge of making more stuff.

Yet the manufacturing component seems poised to evolve again. Co-packers like Fresca, Kitchen Coop and Natural Food Works can work with a limited number of brands; demand is outstripping the supply of co-packing capacity. And some co-packers are launching in-house food brands. With solutions like The Food Corridor on the horizon to connect food brands with other manufacturing opportunities, the next great wave of food innovation may develop around, not through, today’s network of established food manufacturers.

As with other lifestyle manufacturing in Colorado, support from the state’s economic development office is a head-scratcher. I learned that a list of Colorado’s co-packers can be found in the Department of Agriculture’s web pages, because snack bars are made from ag products. But so is Voormi’s vaunted new high-tech outdoor apparel, made from from Rocky Mountain-sourced wool. One assumes Voormi is not an ag business.

It’s a manufacturing business, but policy makers should eventually find a way to provide promotional lift to Colorado’s food business, including its world-class manufacturing value-chain. Clif Harald accurately surmised, “We are recognized around the globe as an epicenter for natural and organic product innovation and leadership.”

That it all starts with 25 passionate entrepreneurs pitching to a room full of discerning industry supporters only makes is sweeter.

Er, more savory.

8 ingredients for Utah manufacturing success

Since launching CompanyWeek in 2013 and CompanyWeek Utah a year later, we’ve profiled more than 400 manufacturing companies in the Rocky Mountain west. What’s emerged is a clearer picture of challenges and opportunities that frame the development of a modern manufacturing economy — and a blueprint for how communities can foster a robust and growing sector.

What makes a great manufacturing community ‘of the future’? Here are eight ingredients:

  1. A cross-industry mix of maker businesses and supply chain. Communities that develop multi-industry manufacturing economies will lead a U.S.-made resurgence. High-tech fabricators, consumer lifestyle and natural products companies will revitalize manufacturing’s image as legacy manufacturers lead the way with expertise and other resources, such as important supply-chain components. A growing, cross-industry supply chain will be transformative. Technology leveraged across all sectors will be a catalyst.
  2. Focus on connecting the manufacturing community, including regional partnerships. Regional and inter-state cooperation is in the offing. Why? Because company-to-company collaboration surpasses local, single-industry investments in business incubators and accelerators in return on time and money invested. It’s also common sense: Want to onshore a service contract? Today it’s hard to find good options — though they likely exist. Get maker businesses connected and best-practices, expertise, contacts and contracts flow more efficiently.
  3. Focus on ‘company creation’, not ‘job creation’. Manufacturing may never be the job engine it once was; for towns like Reno, wins like Tesla come far and few between. But today industry clusters serve the same purpose. In Ogden, Mayor Mike Caldwell has established the city as a destination for lifestyle companies including a growing list of manufacturers. Create a compelling environment for manufacturing start-ups and build a job base from the ground up. Like-minded companies – and jobs – will follow.
  4. Nurture the sea change underway in education. Manufacturing’s again a compelling career option. Industry is helping educators understand that a new generation of manufacturing employees is needed — and now. Some schools, such as Utah State University, get it. Lindsey Shirley and her colleagues there have developed the nation’s first Outdoor Products Design degree, an initiative that aligns with the state’s growing lifestyle manufacturing push in Ogden and under Brad Peterson at GOED. It’s time to embrace innovation in .edu, and push back against the status quo.
  5. Develop manufacturing-specific business financing strategies. CompanyWeek Utah will host the first-ever Utah Manufacturing Growth and Investor Conference next spring. Investor events dot the technology landscape and many others. Time for debt and equity investors to learn more about manufacturing, too — and vice versa. Family-owned manufacturers, in particular, have unique needs. Entrepreneurs always need money. Let’s prioritize manufacturing businesses.
  6. Develop informed public policy support for manufacturing. What constitutes a pro-manufacturing public-policy platform? Renew the Ex-Im bank charter (here’s why); agree on comprehensive immigration reform; fund innovation agendas, such as new internship and job shadowing programs; invest in ‘placemaking’ initiatives featuring mixed-use developments that include light manufacturing; invest in infrastructure, including transportation strategies that enhance the Utah lifestyle experience and business recruitment. The pro-manufacturing list is long, and will take coordinated action.
  7. Women are powering the new manufacturing economy — celebrate their success. Manufacturing is perceived as the domain of men, but a new maker economy can be a posterchild for a diverse workforce. From family-owned companies increasingly run by women to industries such as food and apparel — where women lead the manufacturing resurgence — Utah boasts nation-leading gender diversity. Celebrate it.
  8. Celebrate the connection to our manufacturing legacy — as the foundation for the future. Utah is littered with iconic industrial brands that have endured, succeeded and are now pointing the way to a U.S. manufacturing revival. We’ve profiled dozens, including Peterson Inc., May Foundry & Machine, NRP-Jones and others.

Finally, rally around business leaders willing to challenge business-as-usual development strategies and use whatever leverage necessary to change the way manufacturing is supported in the city, state and national dialogue.

Utah’s poised for great things.

Bart Taylor is founder and publisher of CompanyWeek. Reach him at btaylor@companyweek.com.

Colorado women power the new manufacturing economy—and ponder their future

Eric Peterson’s terrific profile of Rubadue Wire and CEO Sue Welsh serves the much-needed purpose of shining a light on one of Colorado’s most accomplished manufacturers. It’s also segue to a worthy topic, that of the profound influence of leading women in Colorado manufacturing.

Welsh’s story is noteworthy because she leads a growth company in an industrial sector, operating in global markets. There’s added interest because she does it alongside more men than women. It’s compelling because she’s the one sibling of 10 who emerged to lead her father’s business. I’d say she has star power; she’d disagree.

In Colorado, she has company. We’ve featured a long list but the upshot here, in Colorado, is that more women are not only extending family legacies in industrial companies — like Welsh, Susan Cirocki (Arrow Sheet Metal), and Katie Munro (Munro Companies) — but are leading a regional manufacturing surge in other sectors.

Liz Myslik (Fresca Foods), Kim Jordan (New Belgium), Koel Thomae (Noosa Yogurt), Mo Shaffer (Coyote Gold), Beryl Stafford (Bobo’s Oat Bars), Megan Reamer (Jackson’s Honest Chips), and others we’ve profiled are the face of a regional food and beverage sector tipping the national scene on its side. Annelise Loevlie (Icelantic), Diane Boyer (Skea), Tamara Smith (Gibson Athletic), Jessica Montoya (COSewn), C.J. Riggins (KidRobot), and Nicole Smith (Mary’s Medicinals) are among the region’s lifestyle manufacturing leaders. And the list goes on.

Public figures like Denver City Councilwoman Robin Kniech are effective advocates. Kniech is especially well suited to advance manufacturing. She hails from a Midwestern family with roots in manufacturing. “Denver is blessed with some strong women leaders in manufacturing, in sub-sectors like apparel where they are clearly leading, to women inventors using contract manufacturers and those who grew up in the industry and now run smaller, family owned shops,” she told me. “The challenge,” she added, “is whether and how the industry is willing to adapt to attract women workers.”

It’s a provocative assertion — that manufacturing must change to be a more diverse sector. “Lessons learned from other industries indicate that you can’t just ‘add women and mix’,” she says. “You have to think thoughtfully about the fact that statistically, women are still responsible for more home and parenting/eldercare responsibilities, which impacts the kind of workplaces most likely to attract them. For example, last-minute mandatory overtime, a practice in some manufacturing environments to cope with staff shortages or sudden changes in demand, might not be a good fit for women.”

Kniech adds, “The good news is that changes that make workplaces more attractive to women benefit all workers, including men, and are also similar to some of the trends more likely to attract millennials.”

Stacey Bibik, controller at Stacy Machine & Tooling and also a manufacturing brat, sees it differently. “I’m a tough gal,” she admits, “and I tend to stay away from the whole ‘workplace needs to be more female-friendly because we’re caregivers’ argument. Statistics and surveys have supported the fact that including, engaging, and advancing women in the workplace improves the bottom line.”

“So why the shortage in manufacturing?” she asks. “Because women lack encouragement and education about the realities of employment in manufacturing, and those realities relate to the personal satisfaction of making things and the diversity of career pathways available.” Bibik’s also standing up a Colorado chapter of Cleveland-based Women In Manufacturing.

Colorado’s lucky to have both women advocating manufacturing. More than that, the sector needs both voices. From my uninformed perch, there’s profound truth in each perspective. Both are right.

And the irony of manufacturing’s big tent (and getting bigger) is that high-growth industries like natural products and apparel, led by women, will shape manufacturing into one of the economy’s most diverse sectors. Regardless of historic barriers.

Now that’s rich.

Bart Taylor is founder and publisher of CompanyWeek. Contact him at btaylor@companyweek.com.

Reach Denver City Councilwoman Robin Kniech at robin.kniech@denvergov.org, or Stacey Bibik at sb@stacytool.com.

Startup star The Food Corridor gives manufacturers a boost

The Food Corridor, Ashley Colpaart’s food-tech startup, is also the topic of her dissertation at Colorado State University, but to suggest it’s only an intellectual exercise would miss the point entirely.

“I’ve worked in the food realm all my life,” she told me as she was boarding a plane to San Francisco to present at the BonAppetech conference, “from working at the farmers markets with my parents to getting a master’s degree in Food Policy and Applied Nutrition [from Tufts University] and working in all areas of food production and distribution. I’m passionate about regionalizing food systems, in researching food hubs and innovative distribution systems.” Colpaart’s also a registered dietician and was instrumental in the development of the Northern Colorado Food Cluster.

Colpaart’s The Food Corridor leverages technology to impact local and regional food production by connecting food businesses in need of kitchen space with commercial kitchens licensed by local health agencies. The Food Corridor will provide online booking, payment processing, disbursement, and reviews.

It’s also a near-perfectly timed concept that’s quickly becoming the darling of the booming food-tech industry. Colpaart was the FoodTech Pitch Winner at Boulder’s 33Entrepreneurs contest in July, and won Galvanize Fort Collins’ Pitches and Pitchers in September. Colpaart finished in the “top third” in San Francisco, on a national stage. The startup is in a pre-seed funding stage.

Demand for kitchen space is off the charts. Co-packers — food manufacturers that provide the service for emerging brands — are slammed. And a tsunami of food makers — food truck operators, chefs, caterers, farmers, and ranchers, new brands — has exploded on the food and ag scene.

Turns out that school districts, commissaries, churches, restaurants, and hotels, among others, have great facilities that are underutilized.

Voilà! The Food Corridor.

Colpaart is currently focused on northern Colorado, though her eyes are fixed firmly on Denver and beyond. (The website says The Food Corridor is ‘currently piloting in Colorado.’) The idea is already blossoming. Proof-of-concept is coming easy. “Weld County School District’s facilities are under-utilized,” Colpaart says, “and school districts are generally strapped for cash. We’re filling a industry need and providing a new revenue source at the same time.”

The synergy with Colorado’s transformative sector of co-packers, like Fresca Foods and Natural Food Works, is also a selling point. “We’re helping co-packers ensure that food companies are a reality, that they’re ready for the next step,” Colpaart says. It’s no small issue. Fresca Foods CEO Todd Dutkin has told me the company receives 500 applications a year from emerging brands.

Colpaart describes it as the ‘access’ economy and for her it’s an apt description. She’s in the vanguard of wave of young, smart entrepreneurs who envision changing the way food is produced and distributed, or as she says “reimaging food systems and providing people new opportunities to connect with food.” It’s a wholly progressive and modern ethos that’s been percolating under the rubric of the ‘localvore’ movement. It’s a trend that’s exploding, driven by technology and sustaining factors that are feeding the growth of local manufacturing.

The epicenter for innovation in Colorado is Boulder, Weld, and Larimer counties, a growing food-tech community that boasts an empowering combination of agricultural assets, business incubation and companies transforming entire market sectors — like New Belgium and Odell, Noosa, and Madhava — all paving the way and serving as a model for young, motivated talent.

Like Ashley Colpaart and the community of progressive entrepreneurs establishing Colorado as ground zero for a new American food industry. Tomorrow’s 11th annual Naturally Boulder Pitch Slam & Party, a daylong celebration and contest to determine the best of the next crop of food manufacturers, further showcases the market. We’ll report on the event next week.

Bart Taylor is founder and publisher of CompanyWeek. Reach Bart at btaylor@companyweek.com.

Craft giant Etsy invites manufacturers to the party

There’s a line that separates artisans from manufacturers. It varies industry to industry but those who cross it describe the telltale sign similarly. One night you go to bed a hobbyist and wake up a manufacturer, having spent a sleepless night wondering how in hell you’re going to make more.

Game on. Welcome to manufacturing.

We spend millions to make this path easier for some. In technology and healthcare, we incubate and fund ideas before anything’s made. The business landscape is dotted with Think Atomic and Techstars and Innovation Center of the Rockies, an incredible ecosystem that provides a lifecycle path where an idea is vetted, business planned, funded, prototyped, market-tested, and mentored before anyone is asked to buy or manufacturing bottlenecks are encountered.

But there’s a larger and equally passionate ecosystem, thousands of inventors, designers, crafters, cooks, and homebrew artisans with limited resources or expertise. They’re also eager to make a business out of it, but for this group it’s a harder path. Manufacturing’s a pain point for many.

Increasingly business is finding a way — credit a widespread maker and manufacturing revival — and this week an important service will be available to fledgling small businesses seeking enhanced manufacturing capabilities. Etsy, the giant online sales outlet for homemade, crafty products announced the launch of Etsy Manufacturing, a new platform, as the New York Times described it, that “grew out of a realization that many Etsy sellers wanted to grow, but were having trouble finding manufacturers willing to take on small orders from untested business partners.”

Etsy’s inviting manufacturers to the craft party. “Starting Monday, Etsy will invite manufacturers to apply to list a profile, complete with pictures, on Etsy Manufacturing,” the Times wrote. “‘Etsy will review those applications based on a set of criteria,’ said Amanda Peyton, and Etsy executive, ‘including how much the manufacturer makes in-house and how much it outsources itself.'”

Etsy’s not the first — Techstars graduate Dorian Ferlauto launched BriteHub to match industrial designers with manufacturers — but it’s easily the most newsworthy given its size and potential impact. Not for industrial giants but for the wave of American-made products over the horizon.

Will the current community of contract manufacturers benefit from registering on Etsy? According to the Times, the “site now lists over 32 million items from 1.5 million sellers and generated $1.93 billion in sales last year.” It’s conceivable that some manufacturers will find small-batch orders from a tier of products poised to become the next BB-8.

More likely Etsy’s move will advance the maker and manufacturing revival by encouraging even more collaboration between businesses in the manufacturing supply chain just beginning to find one another after decades of finding partners overseas, in Asian factories or European fabric and materials markets. And growth will result. It’s not a game changer; it’s a game enhancer.

But if Etsy works to connect more small businesses, directly, only good things will happen. It won’t take long for the next ProBar, Voormi, Lizard Skins, or New Belgium to emerge. In a fascinating report by the National League of CitiesFour Ways City Leaders Can Boost Entrepreneurship and Propel Economic Growth — the number one recommendation was to ‘Build Connections.’ The report suggested:

While capital constraints represent one of the primary challenges to entrepreneurs, research has shown that public venture funds and local incubation centers result in little to no benefit to entrepreneurs. Instead, cities should focus on fostering local connections among entrepreneurs and businesses. These local connections, as opposed to national or global contacts, are vital to an entrepreneur’s success. Focus should be put on events that cause entrepreneurs to think and act together, building a robust local ecosystem.

We couldn’t have said it better, though we tried.

Connect the players and let business find the way. And rest easy in the process.

CompanyWeek is hosting the next, important connections-building event. Don’t miss the 2nd annual Colorado Apparel Manufacturing Summit next Thursday, September 24 from 3-6:30 p.m. Register here.

CompanyWeek at two years: Six takeaways as manufacturing surges

Since CompanyWeek debuted two years ago this week, we’ve shined a light on 400 or so manufacturers, chronicled the policy efforts to support them (some good, some bad), and served as an advocate for manufacturing even as business voices debate the so-called manufacturing renaissance.

Here’s six takeaways from two years in business that also shape the journey ahead — for us and for the manufacturing community:

1. Manufacturing’s cross-industry comeback continues unabated. I said last year at this time that manufacturers were the story. Today, it’s the collective momentum in the sector. It’s not creating a tsunami of jobs, a reality that fuels manufacturing’s doubters, but employment growth is nonetheless impressive. Consider Colorado: CU Leeds’ always useful Colorado Business Review notes in its mid-year report:

“Employment in this sector continues to make gains, increasing 2.9% in 2014 and 2.9% year-over-year in 2015 for a total of 139,800 Manufacturing employees in the state. Manufacturing employment surpassed committee estimates by 600 jobs in 2014, and is continuing the trend by adding 2,200 more jobs than projected based on growth rates through May 2015. Higher growth in the durables subsector (3.9%) is offsetting lower growth in nondurable goods (1.2%) so far in 2015 year-over-year. Gains in Manufacturing have now occurred for four and a half consecutive years following a decade of employment losses.”

The Review seems almost surprised at the level of activity.

But ‘jobs’ isn’t the takeaway. Manufacturing’s multi-industry growth is. Whether food and beer, aerospace and bioscience, consumer products and advanced, engineered design and manufacture, the maker economy is surging. Louisville’s brilliant co-packer Fresca Foods gets 500 requests a year from emerging brands to manufacture product. Growth market, or not?

2. Public and private sector support isn’t keeping pace with manufacturing’s advance. There’s dissonance and a lack of uniformity about how to measure and track manufacturing, which leads to confusion about how to support it.

CU’s efforts, as good as they are, nevertheless track the design of some manufactured products — like satellites — as Professional and Business Services, a NAICS-driven methodology that works to under-report the impact of manufacturing. To measure only the build of a satellite as a manufacturing activity and not its design underserves the sector.

As I’ve noted before, manufacturing is scattered throughout Colorado’s economic development “Key Industry” framework. It results in uneven support. “Advanced manufacturers” using high-tech processes are the beneficiaries of recognition and money. Sew a jacket or backpack or make organic soup and support is spotty. Ergo:

3. Manufacturing should be a ‘Key Industry’ in a simplified economic Blueprint. OEDIT should dispense with the ‘advanced processes’ criteria and classify every company that makes something as “Manufacturing.” It would simplify the support ecosystem and work to provide needed resources to manufacturers across industries in a simpler, fairer way.

It would also make it harder for elected official to avoid responsibility.

4. Congressional inaction in support of manufacturing is a travesty. Today it’s easy for Colorado Congressman Ken Buck to rationalize his decision to ditch the Export-Import Bank, an entity that provided support to manufacturers.

“It is a type of corporate welfare,” Buck said, quoted last week in the Denver Business Journal. “And when we have $18 trillion in debt and we need to find places to cut, the Export-Import Bank is one area.”

Buck had no such compunction about the welfare-laden ag bill. But without a unified industry voice pushing back on the issue, as no doubt Ag interests do, Buck tacked away cleanly. That it happened at a CACI event — the Colorado Chamber of Commerce, sponsor of the long-standing ”Manufacturing Initiative’ — was disappointing.

Congress has also refused to play from strength and negotiate with the Obama administration to eliminate the onerous 5% device tax on bio-manufacturers or the confusing employer mandate in Obamacare, instead pursuing the dead-end strategy to repeal. 50 times. No relief, no accountability, no support.

5. Where robust support has developed, it now must evolve. We’ve spent millions of dollars to repair a staggering skills gap in manufacturing — a vestige of decades of offshoring. It’s time to let the programs work and now focus on competitiveness and business development.

I asked Dale Denning, vice president of sales for Shop Tools, Inc., about business prospects for contract manufacturers. “If you’re in aerospace or medical, it’s great. If you’re a job shop not working in those sectors, not so much,” he said.

Industry and the public-private partnerships should rally around a new Manufacturing sector to promote Colorado as a destination for maker businesses. Time to feed the business pipeline and let workforce development efforts do their stuff.

6. Manufacturers must agree on the way forward — one that involves a bigger tent. Efforts by manufacturers and entities that support them to come together and rally the sector have been commendable — but they remain industrial-centric. Walls still divide sectors and cross-industry collaboration remains low. (see point 3, above.)

Industrial manufacturing may never capture the public’s imagination as it once did. The clean rooms of bioscience and organic-food manufacturing and lifestyle shops churning out cycle parts and skis, can. Everyone benefits.

Manufacturing has never been more compelling. Its leaders and supporters should evolve and change the way it’s marketed to the public.

Follow their progress in year three at CompanyWeek.

Bart Taylor is founder and publisher of CompanyWeek. Reach him at btaylor@companyweek.com.